Stop stressing about the Archibald Prize!
hugo (detail) image: heraldsun.com.au
Another year of Archibald Prize anticipation has come and gone in the last seven days after now-sophomore winner Del Kathryn Barton took the title with 'hugo' a suitably large-sized Archibald entry executed in watercolour, gouache and acrylic (image above) of Australian actor Hugo Weaving. In the hours following the winner's announcement at the Art Gallery of NSW (AGNSW) late last week, l noticed ripples of protest firstly on social media sites and then later televised with attention being drawn to Victorian artist Jeffrey Kelson's 'one man' demonstration on the front steps of the gallery. ABC's coverage of Kelson's opinions drew attention to the prize's exclusive and un-representational performance as a showcase for common artists attempting to be hung on the balance of their talent rather than their art world-standing and own notoriety and of their subjects (often the same thing). Otherwise on the social media front, blunter inquiries (from a generally younger audience) were stirring as to why the precious money and title needed to be handed to a name of already existing high-stature.
I think some significant factors about the modern-day Archibald Prize are being overlooked, which i'd like to point out for those artists feeling sore over rejection yet again. To it's credit, in it's singularly promenant position, the Archibald Prize is forced to be a premium showcase (for l dare say) those currently hot and upcoming in the local art world, as well as being a platform to pay respect to celebrated senior Australian artists (Olsen, Storrier in recent years). The fact is for many Australians who are only going to visit AGNSW once or few more times a year, due to it's exciting and common controversies, stellar career-pumping and lucrative giveaways, good chance is they're going to see the Archibald Prize, and what they see in that hour or more of visitation needs to itself portray who and what is making up the current Australian art world. Otherwise what other high-profile showcase does the industry have?
For better or worse, it is imperative that the exhibition succeeds as an overblown showcase to indicate the annual direction and new stars of an otherwise largely shadowed community in the mind of the common Australian. I'm sure the AGNSW trustees would love room for you and your precious talents, but there's little space. In truth, the reality of the show is actually very different to the sensitive considered delicacy of your work that you're so driven to have exhibited. Quietly and respectively tottering through the exhibition halls during high season, you'll overhear all the sickening giveaways; 'my five year old son could have painted that' in response to a vision too minimal or expressionistic, next an admirable 'that's a real portrait' from the burly characteristically-Australian father nodding to the technical class of an entry suitable during the winning-streak of William Dargie, and lastly my very favourite and crowning ironic jewel; 'what an amazing painting, it looks just like a photograph!'.
Pondering the space overlooked by great undeniable stares and enormous heads (squint and it commonly looks like Easter Island on a misty day) what l think is imperative for unsuccessful Archibald entrants to remember is that they're not necessarily dealing with a talent contest so much as a highly condensed and yes agreeably tall and exclusive temporary show for the public. Fundamentally if you're work is not needed in order to complete the composition of an Australian art world snapshot as it stands in the year of that running, then (as l'm sure you know deep down) you have a minuscule chance of being selected so don't bother and quit complaining. Naturally the trustees allow newcomers into the wolfden on an almost yearly basis in the crucial display that anyone can be exhibited, but with perhaps only one slot available versus eight hundred entries, it's going to be important for many not to become bitter about rejection.
Firstly for those wishing to be exhibited, try your luck first sweeping under the wing of a gallery of some stature and follow the advice given. Based on your success as an artist, if your gallery or those surrounding your practice that sit in a comfortable cultural position suggest you enter a prize, perhaps even the Archibald prize then that's a good reason to enter, and l would say only in such similar scenarios should you enter. If there hasn't been much whispering in your studio this year, save your $50 (or current Archibald entry fee) and pour it back into your practice or should you feel so inclined, add it to your savings for a good night out after an opening in Paddington or Woollahra, and get those contacts going to assist your ambitions :)
Advertised in bus shelters across the Sydney CBD, the tagline for the Archibald Prize states 'The Face That Stops The Nation' . While it is obvious the AGNSW trustees do relish a little in the hype and sadistic curating enjoyment of handing the prize (sometimes repeatedly) to artists not exactly in dire need of it's rewards, if you have a major problem try other options than handing out flyers on the gallery steps. Immediately l would recommend entering in the Doug Moran prize, or if your mission extends beyond the easel, perhaps guide your efforts towards setting up other art prizes and help ease the exclusive pressures of what exists nationally as almost the only major Australian art prize gaining major attention.
Jim Shirlaw.
